SOLID Data Engineering: Your Code's Blueprint for Success

Embarking on a Journey from Chaotic Coding to Structured, Efficient Data Practices

Let's face it:

Poor code quality in the data realm is a ticking time bomb. As projects grow, bad practices can lead to unmanageable chaos.

Together, we'll traverse through a step-by-step transformation, showcasing how the SOLID principles turned a data migration project from a daunting task into a streamlined process.

You'll discover the Bad, the Good, and the Oh So Rewarding of SOLID Data Engineering. We'll dissect code and unearth best practices, and I'll hand you the tools to make your data pipelines more robust and scalable.

Read?

Let's jump in!

Background: Two Databases

Remember how I challenged you to rethink how you build the Loading step of your ETL pipelines?

Yep, that wasn't me pulling a random rabbit out of the hat. That challenge was part of a mammoth task: migrating Dext's data stack from Redshift to Snowflake.

For those who missed my Stop Writing Spaghetti Code: Instead, Make it SOLID post (which you should totally check out), here's the gist:

SOLID Principles aren't some esoteric wisdom. They are a grounded set of design tenets that make your codebase more like a well-oiled machine and less like a Jenga tower on the brink of collapse.

Also, I challenged you to craft an ETL pipeline to work seamlessly with Redshift and Snowflake. It is a tall order, especially when juggling multiple responsibilities, from overseeing database performance to optimizing data workflows.

This week's plan is to discuss a couple of ways to solve this challenge. The first one is the quick and dirty but unscalable and prone to bugs. The second way is a bit slower. It requires thorough planning, but it really pays off well.

First, let's start with the "easy" way.

The Bad: A Labyrinth of Complexity

Simply put, if you're not applying SOLID principles, your code isn't just bad — it's a ticking time bomb. Let me show you an example that just screams inexperience. Take a look and think about what you don't love about it.

Here, the connect, select, and merge_records functions are intertwined in a dance of discord. Stumbling and fumbling, they check for db_type at every turn. It's a one-way ticket to performance degradation and an open invitation for bugs to party.

Why is this happening?

Well, this chaotic dance routine fails to encapsulate behaviours. If this script were a team, it would be the one where everybody leads, and nobody listens.

OK, I know what you're thinking:

This looks pretty decent, though. What would be the worst that could happen?

Let’s dive in:

Consequences: What's at Stake?

The Only Constant in Life Is Change.
— Heraclitus

You know this quote holds true in data engineering. Hell, it holds true in real life!

Just imagine — making a minor tweak for your Redshift logic could inadvertently throw your Snowflake operations into turmoil.

And what if you need to introduce a third actor into this mix, say, DuckDB?

You'd just add an elif statement to each function, wouldn't you?

Ah, the unspoken costs of cutting corners. At first glance, the naive approach might look efficient.

Who doesn't like a one-stop shop for all your database needs, right?

Wrong!

This hasty road often leads to a web that becomes progressively more challenging to untwist.

Now, let me tell you about some of the consequences of building flimsy code:

Scalability

As your data grows, so do the complexities of your tasks. Imagine trying to scale this kind of architecture. Every new feature becomes an invite for disaster, causing you to tiptoe around your own code.

You don't need to cause yourself this stress, do you?

Maintainability

The rapid advancements in big data technologies require us to adapt and evolve.

Your hard-coded, tightly-coupled structure will resist change, and guess what?

The more you resist, the harder it gets to keep up with emerging technologies. You just sink with the ship you built.

Team Collaboration

Data engineering is a team sport. The stakes are high when each function is a knot in an ever-complicating string.

Imagine bringing a new member onto your team. Tracing back through this complex web could be a nightmare for them. And it's not just rookies; even experienced team members could find it challenging.

Technical Debt

That's a term that should send shivers down your spine. You know, when shortcuts in coding today become the obstacles of tomorrow. The longer you let these issues slide, the higher the interest rates on that debt. And trust me, that's a bill no one wants to pay.

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash

Bottom line:

When it comes to maintaining a labyrinth of code, you're not working smart — you're working hard and not in a good way.

So now you know what not to do. You might be asking what I did to solve that problem.

Now, I'm a seasoned data practitioner with many years of software engineering under my belt. Instead of this mess, I built the whole thing following the SOLID principles.

Let me show you what good means:

The Good: The Symphony of SOLID Principles

Enough with the chaos; let's talk craftsmanship. Let's do the same as a minute ago. Check out this code snippet that sings the melody of SOLID principles, and take a second to understand it before you continue.

See the difference?

It's like night and day!

We've got an abstract Warehouse class, laying down the basic dance steps, setting the tempo for our Redshift and Snowflake classes to bring their unique flair to the performance.

The brilliance of this approach is how it encapsulates specific behaviours. No more guessing games or ugly bugs. You're in control, like an experienced conductor.

Following this set of principles boosted our confidence and really helped us finish the project without breaking anything.

Now, Let me tell you what really makes this script piece an outstanding example of well-designed code.

The Benefits: The Long and Short of It

Long Story:

1. Single Responsibility Principle (SRP): Each class handles one aspect of the process. It's like having a specialist for every role — a dream team, if you will.

2. Open-Closed Principle (OCP): Our Warehouse class sets the rules but is open to letting Redshift and Snowflake perform their own variations. It's like jazz, a foundational rhythm with space for improvisation.

3. Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP): Since both Redshift and Snowflake classes adhere to the Warehouse protocol, they're interchangeable without causing a hiccup.

4. Interface Segregation Principle (ISP): The abstract class doesn't burden its child classes with unnecessary methods. It's lean and mean!

5. Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP): We've got high-level modules relying on abstractions, not concretions. We've just future-proofed our project!

Short Story:

• Modularity: One task, one module. Crystal clear.

• Sustainability: Scalable and maintainable — that's how you build a robust data engineering pipeline.

And if the task to add DuckDB pops up in your inbox, you just need to add a new file. There's like a zero chance to break any other functionality. Areal SOLID Data Engineering, or as the US Navy SEALs say:

Slow is Smooth, Smooth is Fast

Does all of that make any sense?

I hope it does. Please share your thoughts so far, and let's wrap it up!

Photo by Mika Baumeister on Unsplash

The Call to Action: From Chaos to Craftsmanship in Your Data Engineering Projects

So, you've seen the good and the bad. Now, let's make a pact:

No more chaotic code. No more harrowing debugging sessions late into the night. Let's elevate our game.

It's time for craftsmanship in data engineering, don't you think?

Your Next Steps:

1. Audit Your Code: Take a Friday afternoon off and dive deep into your codebase. Yes, even the parts you're afraid to look at. We've all got them; no shame.

2. Refactor Ruthlessly: Identify bottlenecks and complexities in your existing projects. If it isn't serving the purpose efficiently, it needs to go or get a makeover.

3. Embrace SOLID Principles: No shortcuts. Make SOLID a checklist, not a wishlist.

4. Educate and Elevate: It's not enough to implement these changes yourself. Create an internal workshop or a coding standard guide to get your team on the same page.

5. Celebrate Wins, No Matter How Small: Fixed a bug? Streamlined a process? Did you take the first step in refactoring a monolith? Celebrate it! Positive reinforcement goes a long way.

Engage with Us:

Alright, this is a two-way street. If you've found value in this piece, it's your turn to give back to this incredible community of data professionals.

• Share Your Story: Comment below on a time when refactoring saved your project or when not doing so cost you dearly.

• Ask a Question: Stuck in the process? Let's brainstorm solutions together. A problem shared is a problem halved.

• Resource Swap: Did you get a SOLID resource that helped you grasp these principles? Don't hold back; share it!

---

Source: luminousmen